Fun with numbers: Ranking the 2020 Best Picture Oscar nominees


Every year, I try to watch all the Best Picture nominees before Oscar night, but I’ve fallen behind this year and have missed two of the films. Nevertheless, just as I did last year, I’m going to have some fun and try to quantify the qualities of the 7 nominees I’ve watched and predict which ones have the best chance of walking away with the golden man in the next 24 hours.

The awards season for me typically begins with the Venice film festival which runs in late August/early September and is where a lot of the heavyweight contenders have their global premieres. This is also the time when films that have debuted at Cannes in May get their wide theatrical releases. Occasionally there are independent films which screened at Sundance at the start of the year which roll out into theatrical release in the second half of the year and become part of the conversation. And for the past few years, we’ve had the new kid on the block Netflix, schedule limited theatrical releases for their productions to qualify for Oscar eligibility.

Before I get into the scores, here are my thumbnail reviews of the 7 films I’ve watched (there may be minor spoilers):

Ford v Ferrari: This is a really well made movie which is easy to watch due to its linear narrative and classical story-telling with a beginning, middle and end. It ticks all the “Oscar boxes’ including acting star-power (Matt Damon and the chameleonic Christian Bale) and outstanding technical proficiency especially in editing, sound and cinematography (although it wasn’t nominated for the latter). There is no conventional happy ending (and given it’s based on actual events, the filmmakers had no choice in this matter) and that ultimately impacts its ‘likeability’ and ability to win the big prize.

The Irishman: This film was much hyped upon its release, as much for the once-in-a-lifetime combination of Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci sharing screen time, as for the computerized de-aging of these actors. I found it to be an engrossing story and the three-hour runtime wasn’t an issue at all. However, the de-aging was distracting, because my brain kept telling me “that’s not how Robert De Niro looked when he was young”. I was also a bit disappointed not to see any overtly dazzling camera work as I’ve come to expect from the master director…but that’s just me not managing my expectations. The hype has definitely cooled off in the past few weeks and I have a suspicion that it may walk away with zero conversions from its 9 Oscar nominations. But personally, this is a movie that I’ll rewatch parts of from time to time, in the years to come.

Joker: I’ve always been a fan of Joaquin Phoenix and if there’s a movie in this list that is carried by one actor, this is it. I was completely engrossed while watching Joker and could appreciate the meta-connection with its cinematic parent, Martin Scorsese’s King of Comedy. This is a very divisive film, particularly in the US, because it speaks to people who are (or feel) marginalized and appears to legitimize anarchy as a form of justice. I think there’s a pretty good chance that Joaquin Phoenix will win the Oscar for Best Actor on his fourth attempt. And while a lot of critics feel that it is a hollow film, I do rate it very highly.

Marriage Story: This is one of my favourite movies of the year, one that I truly feel affection for, although it seems wrong to use such a word for such an emotionally devastating movie. Like Joker, this is an actor’s movie, with the film carried by the two leads Scarlett Johansson and Adam Driver, as well as the supporting characters playing the three lawyers – Laura Dern, Alan Alda and Ray Liotta. The acting is wonderfully nuanced at times, while the script also gives each of the actors the opportunity to flaunt their acting chops in one or two melodramatic scenes. It’s worth watching director Noah Bumbauch’s 2005 film The Squid and the Whale as a variation of the same story and as a study of how this director’s craft has evolved over time.

1917: This movie has emerged as the frontrunner for Best Picture over the past few weeks. I was fortunate to watch it on IMAX, which is the only way to appreciate its technical achievement. But as physically immersive as this film is, it’s amazing how emotionally sanitized it is, completely the opposite of my favourite war films like say, Saving Private Ryan or Fury. Even for all its physical realism, I was amazed how conveniently the narrative ignored the fact that one of the characters cut his hand on barbed wire at the start of the movie, then accidentally plunged it into the guts of a dead German soldier and then seemed to have no obvious problem for the rest of the film…I would have expected his hand to have gone septic and ready for amputation in the next several hours. I do hope 1917 wins another Oscar for Roger Deakins’ cinematography and perhaps for production design, but I don’t feel it is deserving of the Best Picture award.

Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood: I’ve written an entire post on this nostalgic, revisionist work from one of my favourite directors, so there’s not much more to add. I believe Brad Pitt is the front-runner to win the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor and I’d be very happy with that although it’s a tough call, as the other 4 actors in this category – Tom Hanks, Anthony Hopkins, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci – have all done an equally good job.

Parasite: Last, but definitely not least, is the film that really shook me to my core when I watched it. I can’t find the right words to describe the movie…it works on so many levels, as a thriller and as a commentary on the dynamics of class barriers in society. Jordan Peele has rightfully received a great deal of critical acclaim and commercial success for using the horror/thriller genre to talk about racial and social inequality in Get Out and Us. There is no question in my mind that Bong Joon Ho and Parasite should be placed on an even higher pedestal. I couldn’t help but think of the Eloi and the Morlocks from H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine after watching this movie. I would really love for Parasite to win Best Picture, but more realistically would expect it to walk away with Best International Film.

A special mention for The Two Popes, which although not nominated for Best Picture, did get nominated for Best Adapted Screenplay and deservingly for Best Actor (Jonathan Pryce) and Best Supporting Actor (Anthony Hopkins). Who could ever have imagined that a film featuring a series of theological discussions could be so engrossing. It’s even more amazing that this film was directed by Fernando Meirelles, who broke out in 2002 with the horrifying City of God, a film on the exact opposite end of the cinematic spectrum, in terms of content, pace and tone.

When I did this exercise last year, I used 6 criteria – feel-good quotient, emotional intensity, visual beauty, acting star power, social relevance, entertainment value (which means, did you feel you got your money’s worth). This year, “feel-good” doesn’t apply to most of the movies but I decided to retain it for consistency. Also, do keep in mind that these scores are subjective and seen through my eyes, I’m sure the ranking would be very different for other viewers.

NomineeFeel-goodEmotionalVisualStarsSocialEntertainment ValueTotal
Ford v Ferrari57873737
The Irishman54694735
Jojo Rabbit?????? 
Joker376810741
Little Women?????? 
Marriage Story410687742
1917831042835
Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood978102945
Parasite3985101045

And so my predictor says it will be a tie between Parasite and Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood. Last year, I got lucky as Green Book got the highest score in my tally and did go on to win Best Picture. Of course, I haven’t watched 2 of the nominated films – Little Women and Jojo Rabbit, so this is not a comprehensive analysis. Sadly, Little Women is only due to hit theatres in this part of the world next month and I regrettably missed my chance to see Jojo Rabbit when it had a limited screening at the end of last year. This year, I suspect that 1917 will win, but as you can see, I rank it very high on visuals, entertainment value and being a feel good movie, but it didn’t do anything for me emotionally and had no social commentary whatsoever. Let’s see what happens in a few hours!

Parasite, directed by Bong Joon Ho

Sadly, every year the Academy latches on to a few movies, and then tends to nominate them across all the Oscar categories. A rather lazy approach. There’s a whole bunch of interesting movies out there that would qualify for nomination in one category or the other if only the Academy members took the time out to watch them. I’ve been working my way through several of them (and yes, a couple of them have received Oscar nominations) and plan to put up some thumbnail reviews of these movies soon. The movies in the list are A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, A Hidden Life, Bombshell, Dark Waters, Dolemite is My Name, Harriet, Honey Boy, Hustlers, Judy, Just Mercy, Knives Out, Midsommar, Pain and Glory, Portrait of a Lady on Fire, Queen and Slim, The Farewell, The Lighthouse, The Peanut Butter Falcon, The Report, The Souvenir and Uncut Gems. Maybe next year I should focus on the Indie Spirit Awards which just took place and honour many of the film’s I’ve mentioned here at the end.

Post script 10th Feb 2020: And the Oscar for Best Picture goes to…Parasite! So very happy that this movie received the recognition it deserves. And that’s 2 years in a row that my scorecard ended up with the correct prediction!

Fun with numbers: Ranking the 2019 Best Picture Oscar nominees


So, the 2019 Oscar nominations are out and the fun begins. Variety releases its usual list of snubs and surprises. Websites/experts likewise express their opinions on the nominees. Various people get their 15 minutes of fame by expressing anger over inaccuracies or omissions in films which are based on real-life events or people they were related to.

As part of my own build-up of excitement leading up to awards night, I decided to have some fun by looking at each of the Best Picture nominees and applying a bit of superficial analysis to gauge their chances of winning the Oscar.

To begin with, I clustered the nominees into five groups:-

  1. Political Intrigue – The Favourite, Vice
  2. Music & musicians – Bohemian Rhapsody, A Star is Born
  3. Race and inequality – BlacKkKlansman, Green Book
  4. Superhero blockbuster – Black Panther
  5. Family drama – Roma

Let’s get some context around each Oscar nominee; I have highlighted acting nominations as these indicate that the movie wasn’t just technically superior, but also delivered on emotional content. I have also highlighted cases where the movie’s director has not been nominated, which is unusual and usually is weakens its chances:-

  • The Favourite, dir. by Yorgos Lanthimos, released by Fox Searchlight (10 nominations, including 3 for acting)
  • Vice, dir. by Adam McKay, released by Annapurna (8 nominations, including 3 for acting)
  • Bohemian Rhapsody, dir. by Bryan Singer (unofficially completed by Dexter Gordon), released by Fox (5 nominations, including 1 for acting, director not nominated)
  • A Star is Born, dir. by Bradley Cooper, released by Warner Bros. (7 nominations, 3 for acting, director not nominated)
  • BlacKkKlansman, dir. by Spike Lee, released by Focus Features/United International Pictures (6 nominations, including 1 for acting)
  • Green Book, dir. by Peter Farrelly, released by Universal (5 nominations, including 2 for acting)
  • Black Panther, dir. by Ryan Coogler, released by Buena Vista (7 nominations, none for acting)
  • Roma, dir. by Alfonso Cuaron, released by Netflix (10 nominations, including 2 for acting)

Based on the above stats, one must assume the two movies which didn’t get Best Director nominations start at a disadvantage. Understandable that Bryan Singer hasn’t got a nomination for Bohemian Rhapsody, since he was sacked due to absenteeism weeks before completion of the movie. Bradley Cooper was nominated for his acting, but sadly not recognized for creating that intense, claustrophobic atmosphere in A Star is Born, that put the audience right in the middle of Ally and Jack’s lives.

With the Academy having a predominantly older white demographic, it’s unlikely that BlacKkKlansman will garner enough votes to get the top spot; we should just be grateful that Spike Lee has finally got a Best Director and Best Picture nomination after all these years.

Black Panther will likewise have to be grateful to be the first superhero pic nominated for Best Picture. It will probably pick up a bunch of technical awards, i.e. Costume Design, Product Design, Sound Mixing and Sound Editing, but the absence of any acting noms make it a difficult bet for Best Picture (the last movie to overcome this barrier was the closing chapter of The Lord of the Rings in 2003).

That leaves us with four real front-runners:-

  • Green Book won ‘Best Picture – Musical or Comedy’ at the Golden Globes and won Best Picture at the Producers Guild awards, so that puts it in a strong position. It ticks pretty much all the boxes as you’ll see with my scorecard later on.
  • Roma won Best Director at the Globes and also Best Foreign Film. It’s pretty much guaranteed that it will win Best Foreign Film at the Oscars as well. Will the Academy feel that is sufficient and deny it the big prize?
  • The Favourite seems certain to pick up a win for one of its three actresses who are nominated, but it hasn’t won any other major awards for best picture and may be just a bit too quirky for the Academy. I admired the movie (there is no doubt that director Lanthimos has a singular and distinctive cinematic vision), but I didn’t love it in the way that I love Green Book or adore Roma. The fishbowl style cinematography and the discordant music together actually made me uncomfortable at times. Nothing wrong with that, but it’s probably a bit too edge for the Academy.
  • Vice is a quintessentially American movie, a story of political intrigue and excess (not dissimilar to The Favourite) that is difficult to appreciate for those unfamiliar with the American political milieu. This comes from the same team behind The Big Short, which took on a similar irreverent tone to explain the Global Financial Crisis (which was of interest around the world). The best one can do is to marvel at Christian Bale’s transformation behind facial prosthetics into a spitting image of ex-Vice President Dick Chaney.

Next, I tried to put some science into this process and scored all eight films based on these criteria: feel-good quotient, emotional intensity, visual beauty, acting star power, social relevance, entertainment value. This is how they stacked up, the top four contenders listed first and the remaining four (some of which scored higher than the top four):-

NomineeFeel-goodEmotionalVisualStarsSocialEntertainingTotal
Green Book108710101055
Roma10101027645
The Favourite67984640
Vice455107839
Black Panther10681041048
BlacKkKlansman877610846
A Star is Born4108106846
Bohemian
Rhapsody
968761046

So, the winner seems to be Green Book going by my pseudo-scientific, subjective calculations. If Roma can pick up Best Foreign Film and Best Director for Alfonso Cuaron, I will be very happy indeed!

Oscar nominations – Not a year for subtle performances


The internet has been abuzz about the high profile snubs in the acting categories of this year’s Academy Award nominations. What a cruel, unforgiving world the entertainment industry is! The use of the word ‘snub’ itself indicates some sort of malicious intent with undertones of politics and favoritism. Well, all of that is most likely true. The voting dynamics of the Oscars are no different from that of any vote-based competition (including national elections) – those who spend the most money or effort in marketing themselves are the ones who are most likely to be top of mind or to win. For every high profile film which garners nominations for acting or directing or script-writing, there are twice or thrice as many films which featured equally praise-worthy performances, but just weren’t marketed sufficiently among the Academy’s voting fraternity. Already Robert Redford has spoken about how his highly praised, but little-seen film All is Lost hardly received any sort of marketing and distribution support from its distributor. On the other hand, when completely unknown films have won in the past, observers and pundits have complained that the winners aren’t representative of ‘real world audiences’.

All things considered, I felt that this year’s nominations for Best Actor generally favored brash, over-the-top performances above subtle ones. Hence, the nods for Christian Bale (American Hustle) and Leo DiCaprio (The Wolf of Wall Street) over more nuanced performances by Robert Redford (All is Lost) or Tom Hanks (Captain Phillips) or Forrest Whitaker (The Butler) or even Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhall (both in Prisoners). I haven’t watched American Hustle yet; Mr. Bale is a fine actor and in all likelihood he has turned in yet another superlative performance, but he probably also benefited from the overall marketing behind the film among Academy voters. Mr. DiCaprio surely has received this nomination as a compensation for being ‘snubbed’ in the past, as much as for the quality of his acting in The Wolf of Wall Street. On the other hand, Robert Redford had to carry an entire film with no other actors, with practically no dialogue and with a fair bit of physical effort (for a 77 year old), which he does with amazing grace. I always knew that Tom Hanks would find it tough to win this year with so many other outstanding performances, but I certainly expected him to get nominated. Captain Phillips played out like a documentary – therefore giving Hanks little opportunity for over-the-top histrionics as in the case of Hustle or Wolf – and he did so by completely immersing himself in the character. As I had mentioned in an earlier post, just the 5 minute medical room scene at the end should have been good enough to get him a nomination. Nevertheless, I was genuinely happy to see Mr. Hanks well and truly back in the game with 2 solid roles this year in Captain Phillips and Saving Mr. Banks – both commercial and critical successes. For the past few years, he has either focused on TV and film production duties or appeared in overtly commercial fare like The Da Vinci Code or in duds like Charlie Wilson’s War and Larry Crowne (which he directed himself) or in well-made movies that could not find an audience (Cloud Atlas and Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close). Just goes to show that even an actor as talented and with as good taste as Tom Hanks can’t always get it right.

I do think that Chiwetel Ejiofor and Matthew McConaughey fully deserve their nominations. Both of them delivered compelling and moving performances (in 12 Years a Slave and Dallas Buyers Club respectively) which effectively carried their films. I first noticed Ejiofor playing a drag queen in a British comedy-drama called Kinky Boots (which went on to become a Tony Award winning musical on Broadway). Since then, he has been a very reliable supporting actor in various mainstream Hollywood films. It will be interesting to see where he takes his career from here onwards. Meanwhile, Matthew McConaughey has moved in the opposite direction, leaving behind those crass romantic comedies for meatier roles in indie films in the past couple of years. In Dallas Buyers Club, he effortlessly inhabits the character of Ron Woodroof in a true story about a man who set up an illegal ‘medical club’ in the ‘80s to provide HIV patients with non-FDA approved drugs imported from other countries. The sort of weight loss that he went through to play this role qualifies as surefire ‘Oscar bait’ (Quite likely that Christian Bale’s nomination also was partly on account of his transformation into the overweight balding con artist Irving Rosenfeld). I think the winner in this category will be either Ejiofor or McConaughey.

On the women’s side, there are fewer surprises. Cate Blanchett and Sandra Bullock have long been favored to win for their extraordinary performances in Blue Jasmine and Gravity respectively. I myself am struggling to choose between the two. Dame Judi Dench’s nomination comes on the back of an intense marketing campaign by Harvey Weinstein for Philomena in the past few weeks. Can’t say till I’ve seen the movie if it’s a deserving nomination or just because of the marketing. Meryl Streep’s presence in the nominee list (for August: Osage County) was a foregone conclusion I suppose, as she has been nominated for almost every film she has acted in for the past few years…and deservedly so, I feel. She is a great example of someone who is both talented and a consummate professional. The only weak candidate is Amy Adams; many observers feel that slot should have been given to Emma Thompson for her entertaining performance as author P.L. Travers in Saving Mr. Banks.

Similarly, there has been a lot of talk about Oprah Winfrey not receiving a nomination for Best Supporting Actress in The Butler. I certainly think it was a Oscar-worthy performance. Here again, it is tough to say whose slot she should have taken. Lupita Nyong’o is perhaps the frontrunner in this category for her heartbreaking performance in 12 Years a Slave. Sally Hawkins was good in Blue Jasmine, but not Oscar winning material. I can’t comment on the other nominees as I haven’t watched August: Osage County (Julia Roberts) or Nebraska (June Squibb –who is that?) or American Hustle (Hollywood’s critical and commercial darling – Jennifer Lawrence…and she’s just 23 years old, my God!).

For Best Actor in a Supporting Role, I think Jared Leto stands a very good chance for Dallas Buyers Club (another case of an incredible physical transformation). Michael Fassbender gets his first Oscar nomination for playing the crazy plantation owner Edwin Epps in 12 Years a Slave…it was just 4 years ago that he came to prominence with his short but impactful role as Lt. Archie Hicoks in Quentin Tarentino’s Inglourious Basterds. He is now one of the most sought after actors in Hollywood – equally at ease playing comic book villains, androids, 19th century plantation owners or corrupt lawyers.

All told, this has been one of the strongest acting fields in recent years and it promises to be an interesting few weeks of speculation and debate leading up to the Oscar night on March 2nd.